I’m introducing a new term to the media vocabulary, aclarkbingle story. One that is vapid, vacuous, chauvinistic, voyeuristic, morally questionable, tediously boring, and of no interest to anyone.
I just fail to understand how the people in charge of the media outlets in the country seem to be so immune to any sense of what (or who) people want to see on TV. That or our country is actually populated by morons.
I could not care less about the private life of Lara Bingle, nor do I know anyone who does. Michael Clark seems to be living up to his reputation by flaking out from his job, so no one is really surprised at that.
The whole story just irks me. The media outlets get to take the most two faced stance I’ve ever seen, and when referring to programs such as A Current Affair and Today Tonight (who make a living clucking about how terrible the media is in giving teenage girls problems with body image, and coming right back after the break with informercials about breast implants and diet pills) that is quite something.
Every person in Australia has seen Lara Bingle’s breasts. The Federal Government paid her to jiggle them about in a publicly funded TV ad. The fact that there is assumed to be something noteworthy about a photo of her in the shower has a odour of slut-shaming about it.
The fact she was dating the ape who took the photo calls into question her personal judgement, but that was a fact already in evidence.
The TV execs must just light up with glee at the fact that each time the story is on, the can show footage of this woman in the skimpiest (is that a word?) garments that a PG rating will allow, whilst the presenters make sympathetic noises about how terrible is must be for her to have the shower pictures published.
The photo was quite obviously taken without her consent, and yes that is a legal issue that has been of some public interest. I’ve not seen any real discussion on that point. Samantha Armytage did make one telling comment in revealing that she wasn’t aware Australian’s don’t have a right to privacy. Seeing as she works on a TV program which makes it’s living invading people’s privacy with the morals of an alleycat, one would have though that to have been evident to anyone working as a “journalist” on TV.
Watching Max Markson spin Bingle’s decision to give an interview to the very magazine who published the photo in the first place was so dizzying it made be nauseous.
To have this be the lead story on major TV stations nightly news for four nights running should be an embarrassment to those organisations, but sadly one knows that it really isn’t.